Difference between revisions of "Talk:Myst RLST resources"
From A look inside The Link @ wiki
(about indices...) |
(add comment (and organize)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why are the indices (ID's) zero-based? They make much more sense the way they were with the actual ID found in the files. -[[User:Clone2727|Clone2727]] 21:22, 4 September 2008 (CEST) | Why are the indices (ID's) zero-based? They make much more sense the way they were with the actual ID found in the files. -[[User:Clone2727|Clone2727]] 21:22, 4 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I don't actually understand what those "indexes" are. Are they resource IDs? I see different IDs in my Mohawk files (2002, 2004... in stone.dat). Maybe they are indexes in the sense of the Mohawk format? If this is the case, please use resources IDs instead, that's what is meant to be used. -[[User:TitoDalCanton|TitoDalCanton]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I used the resource ID found in the resource table. -[[User:Clone2727|Clone2727]] 21:24, 5 September 2008 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:24, 5 September 2008
Why are the indices (ID's) zero-based? They make much more sense the way they were with the actual ID found in the files. -Clone2727 21:22, 4 September 2008 (CEST)
- I don't actually understand what those "indexes" are. Are they resource IDs? I see different IDs in my Mohawk files (2002, 2004... in stone.dat). Maybe they are indexes in the sense of the Mohawk format? If this is the case, please use resources IDs instead, that's what is meant to be used. -TitoDalCanton
- I used the resource ID found in the resource table. -Clone2727 21:24, 5 September 2008 (CEST)
